Response 476314193

Back to Response listing

Personal information

2. Last name

Last name (Required)
Goodman

Carriage of documents

1. This proposal introduces new journey log requirements for international flights. (section 3.01 and 3.02 of the Part 91 MOS)

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable
Comments
Bit long winded,how about
1.medical.
2.POH
3.Adequate maps(or electronics)to conduct flight
4.maintenance release

2. This proposal explicitly permits the carriage of documents electronically. (regulation 91.113 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable

Firearms

1. This proposal removes the need for CASA approval for someone to carry firearms on aircraft - for flights not regulated for this purpose under the Aviation Transport Security Act 2004. (regulation 91.130 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked yes
Radio button: Ticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable
Comments
Bit long winded again

Crew members

1. This proposal creates a broader requirement for fitness for duty and removes the prescriptive eight-hour rule for alcohol consumption. (regulation 91.215 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Ticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable
Comments
1.alcohol and recreational drugs to be prohibited full stop

2. This proposal broadens the requirement for cabin crew, to include non-air transport flights carrying 20 or more passengers. (regulation 91.1460 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable

3. This proposal broadens the requirement for passengers to comply with cabin crew safety instructions. (regulation 91.790 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable

Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs)

1. This proposal removes the prescriptive list of permitted portable electronic devices (PEDs) on flights. (regulation 91.145 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable
Comments
Still taking too long and verbose to reach the conclusion

2. This proposal restricts crew members from operating PEDs where that would be distracting to the performance of their duties. (regulation 91.150 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Ticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable
Comments
Does this prohibit a flight attendant from using a mobile phone.We are not far off
Anyone being able to use electronic devices on all flights

Equipment

1. This proposal relaxes oxygen requirements for non-air transport operations. (Division 30.9 of the Part 91 MOS)

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Ticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable
Comments
Hypoxia is insidious.Should be mandatory for safe flight above 10,000 feet

2. This proposal expands a requirement to preserve flight recordings (and recorders) after an immediately reportable matter while reducing the amount of time these need to be retained. (regulation 91.724 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable

3. This proposal consolidates all the rules for the Minimum Equipment List (MEL) in one place and expands who can approve the MEL. (regulation 91.1680 to 91.1705 of CASR and sections 33.01 to 33.09 of the Part 91 MOS)

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable

Take-off and landing

1. This proposal introduces an approach ban for Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) flights under certain circumstances. (section 17.07 of the Part 91 MOS)

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Ticked not applicable

2. This proposal changes the existing low visibility take off and approach exemptions to an approval. (regulation 91.425 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Ticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable
Comments
Is approving body to take the responsibility for any untoward occurrence
Eg accident

Flight requirements

1. This proposal extends the ability for pilots not operating under an AOC or other certificate to use night vision imaging systems (NVIS) under certain conditions. (section 5.02 of the Part 91 MOS )

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Ticked not applicable

2. This proposal introduces the ability for night Visual Flight Rules (VFR) flights to use IFR lowest safe altitudes. (regulation 91.395 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable

3. This proposal introduces a requirement to comply with Air Defence Identification Zones (ADIZ) procedures. (regulation 91.362 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable

4. This proposal creates a requirement to comply with aircraft interception procedures. (section 20.05 of the Part 91 MOS)

Comments
Rather long winded once again.Would be better written in plain English rather
Thanlegalise

5. This proposal reduces the altitude above which a VFR aircraft must (where practicable) use VFR cruising levels from 5000 ft to 3000 ft AMSL (above mean sea level). (section 13.04 of the Part 91 MOS)

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Ticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable
Comments
IFR AIRCRAFT SHOULD BE FLYING ABOVE 5000. Feet to enable adequate
Communication with ATC AND VORS,NDBS

Animals

1. This proposal significantly simplifies the rules for the carriage of animals in the aircraft cabin. (regulation 91.200 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable

Emergency simulation restrictions

1. This proposal restricts the simulation of certain emergencies, predominantly, in Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC) or at night. (regulation 91.570 to 91.610 of CASR)

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked yes
Radio button: Unticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable

General response

1. Are the proposed changes to the general operating flight rules appropriate and can they be complied with by industry without undue burden?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked yes
Radio button: Ticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable
Comments
Simplify

2. One of the aims was to primarily consolidate the current rules and carry over existing regulatory requirements. If you exclude the changes listed in the Summary of Proposed Changes, has this been achieved?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked yes
Radio button: Ticked some change/s required (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked no (please specify below)
Radio button: Unticked not applicable

Your priorities

1. When you reflect on the feedback you have provided throughout this consultation, what are the three matters you consider most important?

Priority 1
Simplification
Priority 2
Safety
Priority 3
Sensibility