Personal information
Do your views officially represent those of an organisation?
If yes, please specify:
Regional Aviation Association of Australia (RAAA)
Please identify your industry affiliation as it relates to your interest in this discussion paper
Please identify your industry affiliation as it relates to your interest in this discussion paper
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Aircraft operator
Radio button:
Unticked
Aircraft owner
Radio button:
Unticked
Pilot
Radio button:
Unticked
Aircraft maintenance engineer
Radio button:
Unticked
Avionics installer
Radio button:
Unticked
Avionics manufacturer
Radio button:
Ticked
Other
If other, please specify:
Organisation representing regional aviation in Australia
Voluntary fitment of ADS-B in VFR aircraft
If you are an installer or manufacturer: Do the ADS-B installation options in the discussion paper offer an appropriate incentive to encourage ADS-B OUT fitment in VFR aircraft?
Incentive to install ADS-B
Please see attached written submission.
If you are an aircraft owner: If the ADS-B installation options proposed in the discussion paper are adopted, are you more likely to install ADS-B in your VFR aircraft?
Would you fit ADS-B with installation options outlined?
Please see attached written submission.
Technical standards for ADS-B in VFR aircraft
Do you think 1090ES ADS-B is the appropriate technology in Australia for supplementing see-and-avoid? (DP reference 1.1.2)
1090ES ADS-B - feedback
Please see attached written submission.
Should an ADS-B solution for VFR aircraft be compatible with ADS-B IN/OUT, ACAS and Mode S (SSR)? (DP reference 1.4.2)
ADS-B compatibility
Please see attached written submission.
Do you think the relaxed fixed installation proposal for type-certificated aircraft is an appropriate cost reducing measure? (DP reference 2.1.1 & 2.1.3)
Relaxed fixed installation as cost saving measure - feedback
Please see attached written submission.
Do you think the installation proposals for aircraft other than type-certificated aircraft are appropriate and valid cost reducing measures? (DP reference 2.1.2)
Installation proposals - feedback
Please see attached written submission.
Are the proposed portable installation requirements appropriate and relevant for situation awareness purposes?
Portable installation - feedback
Please see attached written submission.
Do you think ADS-B OUT equipment authorised to TSO-C199 is appropriate for use in Australia – particularly for use in Class E or G airspace? (DP reference Section 3)
ADS-B OUT to TSO-C199 - feedback
Please see attached written submission.
Do you think there is value in CASA producing an Australian Technical Standard Order (ATSO) for ADS-B OUT products suitable for the Australian environment? (DP reference Section 5)
ATSO for Australia - feedback
Please see attached written submission.
Functional and performance requirements
Is equipment of this type appropriate for use in aircraft that have an MTOW of less than 5,700 kg and are not type-certificated?
ADS-B for MTOW less than 5,77 kg - feedback
Please see attached written submission.
Do you think equipment of this type that is eligible for and reporting a source integrity level (SIL) of 2 or better should be useable in controlled airspace?
Equipment with SIL of 2 or better - feedback
Please see attached written submission.
ABS-B OUT equipment for different classes of airspace
Do you agree with the proposed criteria for ADS-B equipment for the aircraft types and airspace classes as outlined in the table?
ADS-B equipment and airspace limits - feedback
Please see attached written submission.
Use of ADS-B in remotely piloted aircraft (RPAS)
Do you think there is a need to restrict the use of ADS-B OUT in RPAS?
ADS-B OUT in RPAS - feedback
Please see attached written submission.
Further comments
Additional feedback
Additional feedback
Please see attached written submission.