Response 689718063

Back to Response listing

Personal information

Last name?

Last name? (Required)
Philipse

Proposal 1 – Mode S transponder with Class B TABS position source device

Do you agree with Proposal 1 – Mode S transponder with Class B TABS position source device?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Agree
Radio button: Unticked Agree with changes (please specify suggested changes below)
Radio button: Unticked Disagree (please set out your reasoning and alternative suggestions below)
Radio button: Unticked Undecided / Not my area of expertise

Proposal 2 – Integrated TABS device

Do you agree with Proposal 2 – integrated TABS device?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Agree
Radio button: Unticked Agree with changes (please specify suggested changes below)
Radio button: Unticked Disagree (please set out your reasoning and alternative suggestions below)
Radio button: Unticked Undecided / Not my area of expertise

Proposal 3 – Electronic Conspicuity (EC) device

Do you agree with Proposal 3 – Electronic Conspicuity (EC) device?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Agree
Radio button: Unticked Agree with changes (please specify suggested changes below)
Radio button: Unticked Disagree (please set out your reasoning and alternative suggestions below)
Radio button: Unticked Undecided / Not my area of expertise

Proposal 4 – Fast-track the ability to use technically capable, but not formally authorised, transponder and ADS-B equipment in certain aircraft

Do you agree with Proposal 4 – Technically capable, but not formally authorised, transponder and ADS-B equipment in certain aircraft?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Agree
Radio button: Unticked Agree with changes (please specify suggested changes below)
Radio button: Unticked Disagree (please set out your reasoning and alternative suggestions below)
Radio button: Unticked Undecided / Not my area of expertise

Proposal 5 – Amend the existing VFR transponder requirements

Do you agree with Proposal 5 – Technically capable, but not formally authorised, transponder and ADS-B equipment in certain aircraft?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Agree
Radio button: Unticked Agree with changes (please specify suggested changes below)
Radio button: Unticked Disagree (please set out your reasoning and alternative suggestions below)
Radio button: Unticked Undecided / Not my area of expertise

Proposal 6 – Consequential or housekeeping amendments to CAO 20.18

Do you agree with Proposal 6 – Consequential or housekeeping amendments to CAO 20.18?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Agree
Radio button: Unticked Agree with changes (please specify suggested changes below)
Radio button: Unticked Disagree (please set out your reasoning and alternative suggestions below)
Radio button: Unticked Undecided / Not my area of expertise

Proposal 7 – Update only the standards applicable to overseas registered aircraft engaged in private operations

Do you have any comments about CASA’s proposal to update in the short term, only the standards applicable to foreign registered aircraft engaged in private operations?

Comments
None

General comments

Do you have any additional comments about the proposed changes?

Comments
None