Drone discussion paper - Review of RPAS operations (DP 1708OS)

Response 792607573

Back to Response listing

Personal information

First name

first name (Required)
Rhonda

Last name

last name (Required)
Molyneux

Should all RPA be registered?

Select your preferred registration options.

By RPA
Please select all that apply
 None Ticked None Above a specific size/weight Above a specific size/weight For specific operations For specific operations All RPA All RPA
By RPA owner
Please select all that apply
 None Ticked None Above a specific size/weight Above a specific size/weight For specific operations For specific operations All RPA All RPA
By RPA operator
Please select all that apply
 None None Above a specific size/weight Ticked Above a specific size/weight For specific operations Ticked For specific operations All RPA All RPA

Should all RPA users be required to meet training / proficiency criteria?

Select your preferred training and proficiency options.

Training
Please select all that apply
 None None Above a specific size/weight Ticked Above a specific size/weight For specific operations For specific operations All RPA All RPA
Demonstration of proficiency
Please select all that apply
 None None Above a specific size/weight Ticked Above a specific size/weight For specific operations For specific operations All RPA All RPA
Please provide any additional comments:
Operators of drones above 100gm should be required to join an organisation such as MAAA or AMAS and learn to fly and learn the rules.

Should the introduction of geo-fencing be mandated?

Should CASA mandate the introduction of geo-fencing options to limit the operation of RPA in certain areas?

Please select one item
Ticked Yes
No

Are we doing enough of the right things?

CASA seeks your view on the way in which we are approaching regulation of RPA in Australia today and for the future.

are we doing the right things?
The current regulations are good but don't ensure drone users know the rules.