Do your views officially represent those of an organisation?
If yes, please specify the name of the organisation.
Industrial Arc Services Pty Ltd
Feedback on the proposed policy amendments to Part 101 MOS registration, accreditation and transitional provisions.
Question 1 - Do you agree that the Part 101 MOS amendments reflect the change in policy as set out in the summary of proposed change and will work as intended?
Please select one item
Ticked
I agree
I do not agree (please specify why below)
Comments
I think that the change you are trying to create will occur. I don't think you're creating the right change though.
Question 2 - Do you agree that the Part 101 MOS amendments will not result in unintended consequences?
Please select one item
I agree
Ticked
I do not agree (please specify why below)
Comments
I think that you're going to see an increased level of frustration for ReOC holders. I think it's going to increase the number of people who don't register their drones and who don't fly safely. I think you're going to stifle equity, diversity, inclusion and innovation in our industry by making it less accessible to people of diverse and low socio-economic backgrounds. I think you're going to make it harder for teachers to use drones as part of their educational materials. I think you're creating a greater administrative burden for your back when you barely have time to process approvals for licenced ReOC operators. For an organisation that lives and breathes risk, I think you're addressing a set of risks related to airspace safety, but you're neglecting all these other long term risks that are going to cause you significantly greater issues down the line.